Search
21,146 page views over twelve months, updated daily.
|
News this week (dated 28th September 2008) The Beacon Lighting attracted over 200 people and the media to King's Norton - which was one of our objectives . The work that went into setting up gazebos, the stage, the food and the drink, as well as the bonfire itself, was amazing so many thanks to the few who made it all worthwhile. For future events we will need more help as we cannot just rely on a few dedicated people to make these things happen. Two photos attached - one showing Anne Bond hurling a Caroline Flint poster into the fire, and the other showing just a few of the people who attended the event. Many thanks to everyone who came and those who helped make it such a success. The Beacon evening also made some money, which is fantastic, and it all goes into the fund for the legal challenge that lies ahead to ensure Pennbury doesn't happen. To date we have paid our lawyers to ensure we are part of the BARD (Warwickshire eco-town campaign) judicial review process; we haven't a firm date yet, but we expect it to be before Chrstmas. Pennbury cannot happen. It will not happen with your support. Wednesday 25th September showed why it is all worthwhile. We have the national and local politicians doing all they can to stop the destruction of this farmland, there are transport planners working on models, and there are lawyers to ensure the process is challenged and ultimately delayed. We would prefer the Co-op to withdraw like their High Street opponents, Tesco, have done for the Cambridgeshire eco-town at Hanley Grange, but while the Co-op are intrinsically linked with the Labour Party through their Co-operative Party members and financial support, we have an uphill battle. We will ultimately win, I feel sure, but it needs all of you to do your best to heap pressure on the Government and the Co-op. Also this week - there was a County Council meeting that some of us were involved in until after 7pm on Wednesday. The leader's statement included the following paragraphs: • It is becoming increasingly clear that the Government’s eco-towns programme is in a mess. • The protest group in Warwickshire know as BARD has been given leave to appeal to the High Court. The Judge noted that there could be a conflict of interest because as the promoter of eco towns the Secretary of State could also be asked to give approval to subsequent planning applications. This is a concern that the County Council raised in its initial comments to the Government earlier this year. • The status of those locations finally chosen for eco towns – a decision on this is not now expected until the New Year – is also far from clear. They were initially to meet national need and then it was said that they would contribute to the new housing allocations in the review of the Regional Plan. I recently asked the Minister for Housing for reassurance that even if Pennbury was identified in the Government’s policy statement, it would need to be compared to other potential locations for additional housing development and only chosen if it was the best location. She referred me to ‘Eco-towns living a greener future: progress report’ which states: ‘As regional plans or Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) are reviewed we will expect them to consider how eco-towns can help deliver housing. Where an eco-town has already been identified in local plans, or is already proceeding, they should reflect the location and consider the longer-term growth options.’ • The legal advice to the LGA is that the eco-towns programme is likely to be illegal because it fails to allow the most appropriate distribution and location of development for each area to be identified through the sequential Regional Plan and LDF processes. Despite this the Government still seems determined to try to get eco-town locations in by the back door. • Finally, Government officials have clearly indicated that the majority of local authority costs would be met either by the promoter of the eco-town or the Government. The Co-op has so far failed to confirm that it will pay for the costs of the transport assessment for the Pennbury proposal and the Government has announced that it will only make available £100k for the four local authorities in Leicestershire. This will leave a substantial bill to be footed by the Leicestershire Tax payer for what could be an illegal scheme. Like me, I am sure you will find this situation entirely unsatisfactory. I will take legal advice before deciding how to proceed. During the discussion that followed this statement, the scale of the almost £750k costs to council tax payers was described. This is the amount so far budgeted by three of the four councils, plus over £150,000 by the Government on the Pennbury location, and then there are the millions so far expended by the Co-op on this pointless exercise. What a waste of money! Multiply this by 12 to find the total amount probably being spent across the country on the remaining 12 eco-town bids. And here we are experiencing a credit crunch and meltdown of financial institutions and a house building industry on its knees !! HAVE YOUR SAY 8th October - 7pm Great Glen Primary School Main Hall Co-op latest design for Pennbury So, while we are happy to accept constructive criticism, we have to cry "foul" at your leading article "We all need to see a 'final' eco-town plan" (Opinion, September 24), which highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of the briefing to councillors last week. We did not seek this meeting – we responded to a request from councillors for an advance briefing on the masterplan to enable them to answer questions from local people when the plans became public. We made clear at the briefing the importance we attached to the properly co-ordinated release of information to ensure the public was given the full picture. It is regrettable that a small number of councillors ignored this request and briefed the media. They are determined to ensure the plans do not get a fair hearing locally and have used this event as an opportunity to indulge in irresponsible scaremongering using information provided by my team selectively and out of context. We are now forced to sit down and consider only giving briefings for elected representatives when we choose, not on request.We can assure readers that full details of our proposed masterplan for the eco-town will be put before the public early in October. The eco-town is a step-change in community design, with benefits for Leicester and the county – a project on which everyone is entitled to have full information. Lynda Shillaw, managing director, Co-operative Estates. I responded with this on-line riposte and also sent it in an email to Lynda Shillaw : Be ready ... next week we are anticipating the announcement of the start of the next public consultation on the planning policy supplement (PPS) and Sustainability Assessment (SA) documents. These will list the remaining eco-town bids and include information about them. it is imperative that people respond to these consultations which will end 12 weeks later. CASCET will do our best to provide some information, but it is up to you - who do not support the eco-town in this location - to do your bit. Future CASCET events Also students at Oadby Beauchamp College are planning to hold a big debate on the eco-town, so look out for future news updates - could be Monday 13th October depending on speakers' availability. CASCET, Co-op and Transition Group speakers have been invited. CASCET Merchandise - we now have T-shirts and baseball caps for sale at very reasonable prices £5 T-shirts (sizes Medium, large, Extra Large and XX-Large), £4 baseball caps. Both in black with our main slogan STOP THE CO-OP "ECO" TOWN in white on them. Call in at Great Glen Parish Office on Mondays, Tuesdays or Thursdays -10.00am to 12.30pm or contact us through the website.
![]() Sign up, donate, put up posters
|